The Impact of Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” Bill on Education and Free Expression

High school seniors, typically around 18 years old, stand at a significant juncture in their lives. They are old enough to make important decisions such as joining the military, purchasing firearms, and casting their votes. However, in the state of Florida, it appears that the age of 18 is not considered mature enough to engage in discussions that could potentially shape their perspectives on crucial matters. The recent implementation of Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill has led to a controversial situation, particularly affecting the Advanced Placement (AP) Psychology curriculum, raising concerns about free expression and educational opportunity.

The Impact on AP Psychology Education

The repercussions of Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill are felt keenly in the education sector, especially in the realm of AP Psychology. A report by The Washington Post highlights that several large school districts in the state are opting out of offering the AP Psychology course. This decision comes as discussions surrounding sexual orientation are believed to run afoul of the law. This development has sparked debates on limiting free expression and sidestepping complex questions within the academic context.

Erosion of Opportunities

One of the most significant casualties of this situation is the erosion of educational opportunities for Florida’s students. The Post report reveals that eight out of the eleven districts with the highest enrollment in AP Psychology are shifting to alternative courses. This abrupt change affects not only the students’ learning experience but also the careers of educators who have dedicated themselves to teaching this subject. The impact is vast, as AP Psychology is a popular course with thousands of students enrolled across the state.

Struggles and Pushback

Educators and advocates have been quick to respond to this troubling development. Randy Weingarten, a prominent figure in education, emphasizes that this decision robs students of valuable learning experiences. He points out that the College Board, responsible for AP courses, has recognized the issue and taken steps to address it. However, the challenges persist, as teachers, parents, and students contend with the uncertainty surrounding their educational paths.

The Intent Behind the Law

A deeper examination of the situation reveals that the “Don’t Say Gay” bill’s ramifications go beyond the classroom. This policy places school districts in a precarious position, receiving conflicting guidance from different educational authorities. This contradictory approach leaves educators grappling with the responsibility of making decisions that impact both their students’ futures and their own careers. The intent behind the law becomes apparent as it creates chaos and confusion, stifling open dialogue and expression.

Shakespeare and Parody

In a bizarre turn of events, even literary classics like Shakespeare’s works are not exempt from the controversy. Students in Florida are now limited to reading censored excerpts from Shakespeare’s plays. This move is seen as an extension of the broader attempt to control discussions surrounding sensitive topics, even within the realm of literature and art. The restrictions placed on educational materials serve to further highlight the extent of the issue.

DeSantis’s Vision and Presidential Contendership

The implications of the “Don’t Say Gay” bill stretch beyond the boundaries of Florida. As Governor Ron DeSantis becomes a prominent figure in national discourse, his policies are viewed as a glimpse into a potential presidential candidacy. However, recent polling suggests that the “war on woke” narrative may not resonate as significantly on a national level. The focus on such divisive issues detracts from addressing more pressing concerns affecting the general population.


In conclusion, the introduction of Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill has ignited a series of controversies within the education system. The impact on the AP Psychology curriculum serves as a testament to the far-reaching consequences of such legislation. The erosion of educational opportunities, challenges faced by educators, and the broader implications for free expression highlight the need for a comprehensive reevaluation of such policies. As the nation observes developments in Florida, it becomes clear that these issues extend beyond the classroom, ultimately shaping the direction of educational discourse and societal values.